<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too Much Content, Not Enough marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ghostwriterdad.com/content-versus-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ghostwriterdad.com/content-versus-marketing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 04:29:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart@Business Website Design Dallas</title>
		<link>http://ghostwriterdad.com/content-versus-marketing/#comment-10689</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart@Business Website Design Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghostwriterdad.com/?p=863#comment-10689</guid>
		<description>I definitely think content is the most important focus, but at the same time I feel that marketing plays somewhat of a huge roll as well, especially if you’re trying to get results quickly. But as to the content is king post, I definitely say that CONTENT IS KING, and marketing is more like the kings financial adviser, butler, or something. Ha ha ha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely think content is the most important focus, but at the same time I feel that marketing plays somewhat of a huge roll as well, especially if you’re trying to get results quickly. But as to the content is king post, I definitely say that CONTENT IS KING, and marketing is more like the kings financial adviser, butler, or something. Ha ha ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Williams@Electrician Melbourne</title>
		<link>http://ghostwriterdad.com/content-versus-marketing/#comment-10687</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Williams@Electrician Melbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghostwriterdad.com/?p=863#comment-10687</guid>
		<description>“balance is the new king.” Quality content is absolutely necessary. If you just market without that, it’s like inviting someone to a store without anything worth buying. That said, the quality content needs to get in front of as many eyeballs as possible for maximum effect. While I believe we get lots of support from others in tweeting/promoting good quality posts, I think it’s smart to get out there and pound the online pavement ourselves too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“balance is the new king.” Quality content is absolutely necessary. If you just market without that, it’s like inviting someone to a store without anything worth buying. That said, the quality content needs to get in front of as many eyeballs as possible for maximum effect. While I believe we get lots of support from others in tweeting/promoting good quality posts, I think it’s smart to get out there and pound the online pavement ourselves too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachael@dog friendly motels</title>
		<link>http://ghostwriterdad.com/content-versus-marketing/#comment-10496</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachael@dog friendly motels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 05:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ghostwriterdad.com/?p=863#comment-10496</guid>
		<description>Most definitely both are king, one doesn&#039;t work without the other, but while content without marketing at least gives you a fuzzy warm feeling about your site, marketing without content will give you a bad reputation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most definitely both are king, one doesn&#8217;t work without the other, but while content without marketing at least gives you a fuzzy warm feeling about your site, marketing without content will give you a bad reputation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: ghostwriterdad.com @ 2012-05-16 22:11:34 by W3 Total Cache -->
